The Fetal Position: A Pro-Life Argument Essay. Each year there are roughly 6 million pregnancies in the U.S., with 20% resulting in the termination of the fetus, or abortion in other terms. Mathematically, that is estimated to be million babies that have no hope for a future outside the womb (American Pregnancy) The Best Pro-Life Arguments for Secular Audiences by cathy cleaver ruse, esq. rob schwarzwalder cathy cleaver ruse is Senior Fellow for Legal Studies at Family Research Council. Previously, she served as Chief Counsel for the U.S. House of Representatives Constitution Subcommittee and was the pro-life spokesperson for the U.S Argumentative Essay On Pro Life Movement Roe v. Wade, Pro-life supporters were faced with a decision; to keep fighting for fetal rights, or to succumb to the secularization movement that had been building for the past fifty years in America
Free Argumentative Essay on Abortion, Pro-life
There are two types of Pro-Life arguments, pro life argument essay. The first are reasons for being … erm … well Pro-Life while the second are actually rebuttals of Pro-Abortion arguments. Pro-Abortionists hope that bringing up lots of silly excuses will make people forget the logic and reasoning that form the basis of the Pro-Life pro life argument essay. A foetus is a life. Abortion is killing a foetus. This is the Pro-Life argument in pro life argument essay nutshell. Life begins when an egg is fertilised. No, this is not a great debate between two equally compelling but opposing viewpoints where both sides can convincingly defend their positions with highly reasoned and well thought pro life argument essay arguments.
A fertilised egg has all pro life argument essay criteria. Sadly, this is not true, the foetus is a new life. Science distinguishes one cell from another based on two criteria, pro life argument essay. It must have a different composition and a different behaviour from another cell. At fertilisation, pro life argument essay, the zygote is a new cell with a new and unique molecular composition which, while containing the components of the sperm and egg that created it, is distinct from both. It also has a different behaviour from both sperm and egg whose goal is to fuse, as the new cell works to prevent any further fusion.
Otherwise removing your kidney or arm would be murder. But once again this is not true as unlike your kidney or arm the fertilised egg is also an organism. Scientifically, the difference between a cell and an organism is that a cell is the basic unit of a living organism and an organism is a discrete and complete living thing. The scientific definition of organism is a complex structure of interdependent elements that acts in a coordinated manner to carry on the activities of life by separately functioning but mutually dependent organs.
Fertilised eggs are therefore organisms, because unlike human cells that exhibit the activities of cellular life, but do not engage in coordinated interaction in order to sustain the life of the entity as a whole or achieve a higher level of organisation, the fertilised egg is engaged in the process of life — forming a body and directing its own development to the next stages of life including but not limited to, being born, childhood, pro life argument essay, adolescence, maturing, aging and finally, death. Scientifically speaking there is no way out.
A fertilised egg is a life and abortion would be ending that life. This is the Pro-Life argument. The Pro-Life argument is that a foetus is a life. You see, putting the above problems with the personhood argument aside, its pro life argument essay point that a foetus is not a human being in the same way a fully developed human being is a … well human being, is valid. Human beings have special qualities that make them superior to animals, pro life argument essay. The superiority of human beings comes from something to do with their intellectual capacity, consciousness and sense of personal identity. This being the case, while it may be wrong to kill a human being, the same may not necessarily hold true for a mere human life.
What makes a human life special is the fact that it will become something even more special. This is more than saying that a human life is a potential human being because potential may or may not be actualised. The truth is that everybody agrees with this already. One last point on this. On the other hand, preventing a human life from developing into a human being may be as bad as killing a human being. This means that the essential crime of murder is the prevention of life, which occurs regardless of whether the murdered is a fully developed human being or a mere human life, pro life argument essay.
Because being Pro-Life means being pro anything that will develop into a human being. As already mentioned, the second type of Pro-Life arguments are actually rebuttals of what Pro-Abortionists think are great arguments for being Pro-Abortion. Also, as already mentioned, there are a lot of rebuttals because there are a lot of Pro-Abortion arguments, as Pro-Abortionists are trying to use quantity to overwhelm quality. But we can sort Pro-Abortion arguments into the following four categories: more arguments that a foetus is not a life, accusations of sexism and general meanness towards women, negative ramifications of making abortion illegal, and proving that Pro-Lifers are hypocrites.
And then present the Pro-Life arguments that refute them. The argument goes something like this. At a certain stage a foetus becomes viable, meaning that it can survive outside the uterus. Now obviously, the Pro-Life argument has already dealt with this point. Science shows that human life starts at fertilisation and preventing it from developing into a human being by killing it is not a highly admirable thing to do. Why should the inability of a foetus to survive in an environment different to the one it is able to survive in mean that you can kill it?
This Pro-Abortion argument suggests that no being has the right to be a pro life argument essay and live off someone else, so the mother has the right to get rid of it. In fact, everyone believes exactly the opposite. This argument is made in many forms. The point they are making in all three forms are essentially the same. The Pro-Life argument in response is that the far more pro life argument essay right to life of the foetus always trumps who? the far less important right of a person to do what they want with their own body, pro life argument essay. Yes, her rights are being taken away, but this occurs in all cases where the rights of two people, conflict.
This is so obvious that Pro-Abortionists have had to resort to rewording the issue for it to have any impact. Additionally, this is a childish argument. Yes, making abortion illegal would mean there would pro life argument essay laws that govern what women can do with their body but not men. So what. On the other hand, giving women the ability to decide whether or not to kill their own children because otherwise there would be the smallest of gender imbalances, is embarrassingly small minded. Besides, any impact a foetus causes is temporary. Nine months of pregnancy then you can give your child up for adoption. On the other hand, pro life argument essay impact of abortion for the aborted is permanent.
And yes, I do appreciate the enormous impact of pregnancy, birth and looking after children, but impact is not a factor in pro life argument essay having an abortion is right or not. It will also result in more women not having an abortion in the first place and in less children being killed. By the way, this is probably the worst of all Pro-Abortion arguments. This is completely absurd. Instead there should be no law protecting unborn children from being killed so that those who want to kill them can do so safely. Somebody has lost their mind! I have mentioned some Pro-Life arguments that are based on the fact the mother was a willing participant in an act she knew could result in a child.
But the answer to unfairness is not even more unfairness by preventing a human life from developing. Yes, people say these things and actually think their points are so powerful that they have destroyed all Pro-Life arguments. Well so what? The Pro-Life argument is that a fertilised egg is a human life that will develop into a human being. Nowhere does it argue that human life is the same as a human being. Nor does it make it absurd that the less developed a human life is, the less sad you will be if it fails to become a human being. There is a difference between your feelings towards a developing human life at its various stages of development failing to become a human being and someone actively preventing that development.
Failing to actively do something to ensure a fertilised egg gets into a position to develop further is not morally unacceptable, pro life argument essay. Preventing a fertilised egg inside the uterus that will naturally develop into a human pro life argument essay from doing so, is, pro life argument essay. Let me know when you find a significant number of people who are Pro-Life who are also against the welfare state? This is the stupidest Pro-Abortion argument of all. Obviously not. Nevertheless, the principle of this argument is absurd. The stupidest Pro-Abortion argument is actually the one that claims that men are not allowed an opinion on abortion because it only affects women.
Because the ability to look at something and make a moral judgement on it, is based upon objective logic and reasoning, not some random aspect of the issue like whether or pro life argument essay it affects you. After all, some of the foetuses that have and will be killed by abortion would have gone on to become men. Surely as an affected party they have the right to an opinion on the matter, pro life argument essay. I'm Sam Taylor. I don't really like pointing out stupidity when I see it, but I'm going to. It's my way of reaching out to those who can actually think. I always thought that defunding the police is a bad idea for one simple and obvious reason: Less police leads to more crime.
Welcome to a complete guide of Pro-Life answers to Pro-Choice arguments. With ten arguments that fall into one of four categories of Pro-Choice objections and simple and easy answers for each one, Skip to content There are two types of Pro-Life arguments. The Pro-Life Argument: A Foetus Is a Life A foetus is a life, pro life argument essay. Guess which side does which. Go on. The Second Type of Pro-Life Arguments: Rebuttals of Pro-Abortion Arguments As already mentioned, the second type of Pro-Life arguments are actually rebuttals of what Pro-Abortionists think are great arguments for being Pro-Abortion. Rebutting Arguments Pro life argument essay a Foetus Is Not a Life The Foetus Is Not Viable Outside the Uterus The argument goes something like this.
The Foetus Is a Parasite This Pro-Abortion argument suggests that no being has the right to be a parasite and live off someone else, so the mother has the right to get rid of it. Making Abortion Illegal Will Result in Women Dying of Unsafe Abortions It will also result in more women not having an abortion in the first place and in less children being killed. How Is It Fair Not to Let Victims of Rape Have an Abortion? Are you suddenly changing the subject from murder to financial condition? Continue Reading.
Reframing Reproductive Rights: Going Beyond Pro-Choice vs Pro Life - Asha Dahya - TEDxNormal
, time: 12:47Pro Life Abortion Essays - Examples of Argumentative Research Paper Titles, Conclusions GradesFixer
The Fetal Position: A Pro-Life Argument Essay. Each year there are roughly 6 million pregnancies in the U.S., with 20% resulting in the termination of the fetus, or abortion in other terms. Mathematically, that is estimated to be million babies that have no hope for a future outside the womb (American Pregnancy) Pro-Life Essay Pro Life. Abortion is a very common debate in the world, and it has been this way for hundreds of years. There are two Essay on The Right to Life: Pro-Life. Opinions, views and emotions run high and passion is their fuel. Pro-Choice Abortion: Not A Matter Of Pro-Life Or The Pro-Life argument is portrayed as a moral debate, however it’s largely a philosophical one pertaining to the beginning of life. Preface For many years science told us that the beginning of life is at conception, however, in modern times the line is starting to
No comments:
Post a Comment